[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [xml-dev
And it leads back to the question: can a PSVI or TAI/ATI be reduced to a transform? Reading the www-tag discussions, it seems that XML may become even more complicated and less flexible. Type augmentation seems to be an application concern, not an XML Infoset concern. The only way I know to keep those distinct is to regard augmentation as transformation. I'm leery of InfoSet primacy. I'm not sure why, but it feels like an abstraction becoming an instance of something else. len From: Francis Norton [mailto:francis@r...] Hi Eddie, Eddie Robertsson wrote: > Maybe I'm mistaken but isn't this exactly what Francis' TypeTagger [1] > tool does? It will parse a W3C XML Schema document and annotate the > elements in the instance document with the type information from the > schema. True, it won't annotate attributes with their types but it's > certainly a step in the direction of an XML form for a Typed Infoset. Yes, you're absolutely right - which makes my original question a bit ironic really!
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|