[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xsi:type and broken contracts
Henry S. Thompson" wrote: > >... > > That was certainly the goal. If you _do_ depend only required > sub-parts/attributes, and _don't_ access sub-parts by working backwards > from the end, you will always win regardless of xsi:type. Is it that simple? What if I have a content model like <!ELEMENT a (b,c)+> (but expressed in XML Schema!) Can someone extend it: <!ELEMENT a' ((b,c)+,c,b)> If so, that could really confuse most element-triggered processing specifications. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|