[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace qualifi

• To: <xerces-j-dev@x...>,"Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM" <keshlam@u...>
• Subject: Re: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements
• From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@e...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:26:35 +0100
• Cc: "<sax-devel" <sax-devel@l...>,"Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo" <elharo@m...>,"<xerces-j-dev" <xerces-j-dev@x...>,"<xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <OFB50A7670.4B8433FF-ON85256BCF.004A5522@l...>

agreed

Rob Lugt
ElCel Technology

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM" <keshlam@u...>
To: <xerces-j-dev@x...>
Cc: "<sax-devel" <sax-devel@l...>; "Elliotte Rusty Harold
<elharo" <elharo@m...>; "<xerces-j-dev"
<xerces-j-dev@x...>; "<xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace
qualified elements


>
> It's been pointed out that my last note was some what garbled, due to an
> editing goof (sorry!) -- let me try again, rephrasing the whole thing:
>
> Do we have consensus that when namespace processing is turned on, a
> non-qualified element or attribute has the same value for both QName and
> Local Name?
>
> If so: we've resolved the subject question; move to close debate.
>
> If not: Could someone indicate where the remaining confusion lies? (I know
> I could benefit from some re-focusing of the question; I suspect that
might
> help others as well.)
>
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: sax-devel, sax-devel@l...
> See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel
>
>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schema considered harmful?
• Next by Date: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schema considered harmful?
• Next by thread: Why datatypes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread