[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5?)
At 12:45 PM 5/7/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >It's very useful because the representation doesn't _require_ you to >process it in a particular way. The looseness of the representation (as >Uche pointed out earlier) is actually a benefit for exchanging XML among >diverse processing environments. Please illustrate this benefit with an example that is concrete enough to evaluate. Show me an example where the typing of XPath 2.0 gets in your way. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|