[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?

• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:58:37 +0100
• Cc: jonathan.robie@d..., jeni@j..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001501c1f7ab$d602f1b0$6501a8c0@pcukmka>(michael.h.kay@n...)
• References: <001501c1f7ab$d602f1b0$6501a8c0@pcukmka>

> The feedback would be even better if some of it found its way to
> public-qt-comments@w..., where a lot more members of the WGs would see it.

yes and no. it's hard to have discussions on the comment lists as
typically few people are subscribed (just sad fools like me, and
probably Jeni, and the WG members) They are good when you have a
specific comment "section 3.5.3 is inconsistent with section 5.3.4...)
but it's hard to send in a comment that expresses vague (or not so
vague) unease that Xpath has lost its way somewhere. Whereas xml-dev is 
full of people well versed in expressing unease with core XML
technologies, so is a rather more amenable forum for WG bashing:-)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread