[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?

• To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:45:32 -0700
• Thread-index: AcH8GNI2Rui+YLnORbuC1N9XmrrtdAANTC6Q
• Thread-topic: Objections to / uses of PSVI?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:59 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Objections to / uses of PSVI?
> 
> 
> > So there are only four new information item types introduced?
> 
> Sort-of, but they're really the least interesting bit of it.  
> More interesting are the extensions to the element and 
> attribute items, and the schema components themselves.  In 
> order to get any information about (say) a type you need to 
> look at its properties, and the schema spec talks of 
> information items isomorphic to the schema components.
> 

Forgive my ignorance but exactly what does isomorphic mean in lay terms?
I am sure that I've been misinterpreting in the XSD spec. Speaking of
terms in the W3C XML Schema recommendation I didn't fully grasp, how do
you modulo one set of rules against another set of rules?

Thanks.  

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The "big" pay raise will always come next year.
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Open Standards Organization
• Next by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Previous by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread