[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdat
Correct. Now, can someone assert that having XML conform to one might make that problem 1. Easier 2. Harder 3. Go away. 4. None of the above. Will I also have XSD versions for each one of the three with some slight overlaps? And for each edge system to be integrated, the same problem? Ummm.... SOAP/RPC looks better and better. len From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 14:02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Urr... that list I posted was in my queue specifically > because we have to worry about precisely that. For any > vendor that sells in different market tiers, it becomes > necessary to use different backend database system with > different price break options. In our case, we have > to support three different backend relational systems, > and if XML obligates us to datatype definitions, four. And you've been unable to convince the backend vendors to conform to a single type system? Alas.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|