[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Crystallization?

• To: <xml-dev@l...>,<uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: Re: Crystallization?
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:29:37 -0400
• References: <200205071449.g47EnAB22029@l...>

Hi Uche,

Uche said:
> My own definition of successful XML is as follows:
>
> - Basically all that makes up Tim Bray's XML Skunkworks document
> - XPath 1.0
> - XSLT 1.0 + EXSLT
>
> There are other successful vocabularies built on this foundation, such as
SVG,
> but I'm mostly dwelling on the foundation.

Didier replies:
Yep. It seems that the Pareto principle can be applied here: 80% of the
useful functionality is given by 20% of the recommendations.

cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • Crystallization?
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...

• Prev by Date: Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by Date: Re: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
• Previous by thread: Re: Crystallization?
• Next by thread: RE: Crystallization?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread