Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Fwd: Re: What does SOAP really add?
 Hi Paul, Paul said: > My point in the article I referenced is that the web is a system with > its own data model. If you want to get the full benefit of the Web you > need to map things into that model in the same way that you only get the > benefit of SQL by mapping things into the relational model. The web is > flexible enough that you can hack your way around the model (much easier > than you can in, e.g. SQL) but then you will run into limitations like > the SQL encoding issue. Didier replies: If we refer to the Uniform Resource Locators then each resource is identified with a "location". if obtaining data/content means that we are only allowed to obtain it with an HTTP GET (REST presumption) through a URI, for instance a locator (i.e. a URL), then if we use query templates to obtain content we will have to perform two operations: a) POST the template to the server b) GET the result from it I guess that people where responding with two classical human reaction to this: a) resistance to sleep in a procrustean bed. Said differently: to be too much constrained by an architecture when this latter is costing more than other ways of doing things b) speaking of costs, the Maupertuis principle says that people will seek the most economical solution (in the long run as economist like to say). The most economical solution for people was to use an HTTP POST since it involves a single operation (request-response) and a simple server implementation (a lot more simple as you can presume than with a dual operation). You send the template and get back the document. All in one single operation. As people saw that SGML when applied to the web was too complex (this is why XML was created), it is possible that the Web architecture as proposed by REST is also too restrictive and leads to more complexity or non-economical ways of doing things. Off course the political arena will polarize people around one or the other solution. Sciences and technology is not free of politics (after all humans created both and humans are political creatures). Nonetheless, people having to resolve concrete problems will always struggle with the Maupertuis principle and therefore will resist being forced to fit in a procustean bed (this implies that they will try to seek a solution as did the group who created XML when constrained by the SGML architecture). I agree, to use SOAP everywhere is not the best solution. To try to fit everything to the REST architecture is also not the best solution. To finally propose HTTP guidelines is a good solution but is a bit too late since millions of applications are actually dependant on other ways of doing things and since W3 is not a Procrustean tyrant, it can't cut our legs to make us fit in the prescribed bed (i.e. solution). Especially after so many years the specs wehre published and after millions of applications did the "mistake" already. It is what we could say is a de facto solution to a problem(like others say its a de facto standard). SOAP is actually using HTTP as a transport. Maybe this is not a good solution too. Maybe people would be satisfied if it got its own port (not the port 80 dedicated to HTTP). Maybe *this is the real issue*. SOAP is using HTTP as a trojan horse and maybe is perverting its original dedication, threfore it should have its own port. Otherwise, it is an HTTP application and thus, the role of POST and GET has to be re-think in the light of actual usage (i.e. common practice - to think as common law or common sense). So what about having SOAP to get its own port and therefore be a real transport protocol, this time based on XML instead of the format proposed by internet messages (like SMTP, SIP, HTTP, WEBDAV, etc..). cheers Didier PH Martin 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
