[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark

• To: 'Elena Litani' <elitani@c...>, 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark
• From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:01:41 +0100

So the bug reported by the article from Sun has been fixed since ?

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Elena Litani [mailto:elitani@c...]
>Envoye : mercredi 13 mars 2002 18:47
>A : xml-dev
>Objet : Re:  Java Technology and XML : API benchmark
>
>
>Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
>> Parsers like Xerces have dramatically grown in size
>> and have performance problem due to the fact that validation 
>is built in in
>> the parser.
>> To me, parsing and validating are two different activities. 
>They may have
>> been integrated for performance reasons of the 
>parsing+validation pipeline,
>> but I'd still like to have a clean, high performance parsing 
>pipeline in
>> which I could plugin any kind of validators (eg. Sun MSV).
>
>
>The validation is no longer built in in the Xerces 2 parser [1]. The
>parser pipeline may consist of any combinations of components. The
>components, such as XML Schema Validator, can be removed or 
>added to the
>pipeline. Moreover, using XNI [2] users can write new 
>components and add
>those to the pipeline (using new parser configurations). 
>For more information refer to XNI design [3].
>
>[1] http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/index.html
>[2] http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/xni.html
>[3] http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/xni-design.html
>
>-- 
>Elena Litani / IBM Toronto
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark
• Next by Date: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
• Previous by thread: RE: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark
• Next by thread: RE: Java Technology and XML : API benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread