[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matt er?)
> RELAX NG does not require anything beyond what is provided by > SAX and DOM, > and can be cleanly layered on top of the parser. Xerces (or rather > Xerces-J, which I assume is what you mean) supports SAX 2, > and so works > just fine with both Jing and MSV. There would be no advantage > in having > Xerces-specific RELAX NG support. Does this means that Xerces-J (yes, I meant the Java version) can validate an instance against a RELAX NG schema? I can't understand how this would be possible with just support for SAX and DOM; wouldn't the parser have to understand RELAX NG semantics? Matt
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|