[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Ummm... why is that so inappropriate? It seems to describe what they are there to define: a means/form to define one's own architecture of associations among application languages. Maybe understanding matters too and some things aren't easily understood with a quick glance. Perhaps tha is why we have too many web magic words and XML myths. len -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] > > | To this day, nobody has explained what's so unattractive about the > > | AF paradigm, or the precise nature of the esthetics that found the > > | AF solution "ugly". I've always said that the main barrier to adoption of "architectural forms" has been the ludicrously inappropriate name for the concept. Names matter.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|