[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives

  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:15:46 -0800

xsd directives
While tinkering with XLink and RDDL, I had an idea that I thought I'd toss
out on this list. I'd be interested to know if there have been similar
proposals in the past.

A number of specs put forward specialized mechanisms for associating
external resources with a document for a specific purpose. For example, XML
Schema gives us the "xsi:schemaLocation" attribute, XML Catalog gives us the
"oasis-xml-catalog" PI, and for associating stylesheets, we have the
"xml-stylesheet" PI. It seems like these could be unified into one
generalized mechanism by building upon XLink and RDDL constructs. You
couldn't use XLink syntax directly since these examples all must be declared
before the document element or on the document element itself. But it seems
to me that one could designate a generalized PI that mimics XLink simple
links that could achieve the desired result.

For example, the attribute "xsi:schemaLocation='http://foo/bar foobar.xsd
http://yadda/yadda yadda.xsd'" could become:

  <?xml-link role="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
arcrole="http://foo/bar" href="foobar.xsd"?>
  <?xml-link role="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
arcrole="http://yadda/yadda" href="yadda.xsd"?>

The PI <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="style.css"?> could become:

  <?xml-link
role="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/css"
          href="style.css"?>

The PI <?oasis-xml-catalog catalog="http://example.com/catalog.xml"?> could
become:

  <?xml-link role="urn:oasis:names:tc:entity:xmlns:xml:catalog" 
             href="http://example.com/catalog.xml"?>

This seems to me better than the current situation for the following
reasons:
* Provides a consistent, extensible mechanism for these sorts of processing
directives.
* Leverages namespaces and URIs for identifying the intent and purpose of a
directive.
* Does not clutter up the document's infoset with processing directives as
attributes do.

Is this a reasonable idea or am I off my rocker on this? Have there been
similar such proposals?

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.