[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] Ther

• To: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@r...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 00:11:25 -0500
• References: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFIEBFENAA.danny666@v...> <E16Ufno-0006SM-00@s...>

Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:

> On Saturday 26 January 2002 08:09 pm, Danny Ayers wrote:
> > >I don't think the document is the place to specify the sets of
> > >applicable semantics.
> >
> > By supplying namespaces, aren't you doing exactly that?
> 
> One reason why I vehemently dislike them.... they give people a sense 
> of false security.
> 

But how do you really feel about namespaces?

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
  • Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: Web/HTTP History
• Next by Date: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: RE: Non-validating parser, non-existing DTD, undefined entity and error reporting
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread