[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The use of XML syntax in XML Query
At 01:51 PM 1/3/2002 -0500, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >I want both at the same time, and see no reason I can't have that. :-) For >the record, I specifically reject any syntax so complicated that I can't >write it in BBEdit. i.e. no special tools should be necessary to generate >an XQuery. I'm smart enough to write SQL and XSLT by hand. Why does XQuery >need to be any more complex than this? That rules XQueryX as it exists >now, but it could be fixed if that were considered desirable by the >working group. I'm also flexible enough to accept a completely non-XML >syntax. But I can't imagine trying to teach and explain this wishy-washy, >in-between mess that's being proposed. I think that the computed element constructor syntax should do the trick for you, then. Since embedding queries in XML documents is important to you, you will probably want to avoid the angle-bracket syntax for element constructors. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|