[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: 2002 as the year of XML (meltdown due to patents)
Joshua, of course I'd dispute that I forked RSS, but who cares, you're right -- I believed then and now that the complexity of RDF is inappropriate to a format like RSS whose goal is easy deployment by non-technical people. It is so ironic to have been dragged into this patent mess over RDF. This patent stuff adds so much confusion that didn't used to be there. What to do. What if I come up with a new format that isn't called RSS that has no linkage to RDF. What happens when the lawyers one-up each other and someone shows us their patent for XML? OK, then I revert to comma-delimited text files, but someone else has a patent on that. I could go back to the text-based format I used in the 80s, before they were issuing software patents. Now I not only have to grok the lunacy of other developers, I have to predict what lawyers will do, and then judges and juries. Put another way, if you knew a young person today who wanted to study computer science, would you advise them to also get a law degree so they can actually practice the art? How many programmers want to become lawyers? I didn't. Ooops. Dave PS: I made sure to preserve the art of the 80s in case we have to deal with lawyers on OPML -- it is totally derivative of what we were doing then, which was called dothead format. ThinkTank and MORE still read it, as does Frontier and Radio.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|