[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: xmlns:xml = "???"
Agreed as long as the spec author has some reasonable notion of what the provenancing organization can control. Otherwise, it becomes wishful thinking or the author has to set about increasing the scope of control of the organization. Life is too short to spend all morning in the closet looking for the tailored shirt if all I have to do is go sit at a desk and type. :-) len -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] > Lots of stupid things are legal. Lots of not so stupid > things aren't. > And the spec needs to make it absolutely clear which stupid things are legal and which aren't. I'm not at all comfortable with Tim's answer, which I read as: "This is legal but stupid, so it would be OK to produce an error message".
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|