[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Generality of HTTP -- OT

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Generality of HTTP -- OT
• From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:10:07 -0800
• References: <E16UHB8-0007DG-00@h...>

If it's reified, does that make it King Len?  Thereby allowing  solution of
all the problems of the web, by royal decree?
Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Bohlman" <ebohlman@e...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: RE:  Generality of HTTP


...
> I think the point is that "The Web" is an emergent phenomenon of all those
varyingly hooked-up
> pieces, just as Len Bullard is an emergent phenomenon of a bunch of
ever-changing cells, and that
> treating it as if it were a physical object would be committing the
fallacy of reification.

• References:
  • Re: RE: Generality of HTTP
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Next by Date: RE: Entity resolution vs. URI resolution
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread