[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:39:46 -0500
• In-reply-to: <p04330102b869de1da372@[192.168.254.4]>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <83ZYEAYV95C0XUSGAOINSOION832W.3c42e858@MChamp> <E16QLOL-0008TR-00@s...> <p04330102b869de1da372@[192.168.254.4]>

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 08:26 am, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 11:15 PM -0500 1/14/02, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:
> >What happens if I don't
> >   a) read english
>
> 1. Ask a colleague who reads English
> 2. Hire somebody to translate it into the language of choice
> 3. Get a dictionary

Let's change it to Maori then. Do you have 1) or 2)? How much would 2) 
cost?

> >   b) know the schema
>
> I read the English.

or the Maori apparently.

The point is that XML can be as opaque as anything else, and that 
tags, in and of themselves, say little about overall semantics, and 
hardly anything about structure beyond encoding an attributed tree.

An attributed tree is admittedly a useful data structure, but not 
without some means for interpreting it.... and in that regard, XML is 
no better, and perhaps somewhat worse than CSV... because the signal 
to noise ratio is higher *if* the names are not intuitive to the 
interpreting entity.

There *are* benefits to using XML well, and defining "largely 
interoperable" tag vocabularies (HTML). Those benefits spring not from 
XML, but rather, careful use thereof.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: GUID and LUIDs
• Next by Date: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by thread: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread