[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Validating schema vs. non validating schema

• To: Krakow Patrice <Patrice.Krakow@S...>
• Subject: Re: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:57:48 +1100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Allette Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd
• References: <6DD4CD85D040D51182630002A5513E060253AB81@m...>

Krakow Patrice wrote:

> What do you prefer?
>
> <length uom="...">
> <weight uom="...">
> where uom=m|mm|kg|g
>
> <length length-uom="...">
> <weight weight-uom="...">
> where length-uom=m|mm and weight-uom=kg|g
>

How about:

     (milli | centi | deci | deka | hecto | kilo)

for both of them? Other than that, I don't see it making much difference
either way - it's pretty much just personal preference.


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein

• References:
  • Validating schema vs. non validating schema
    • From: Krakow Patrice <Patrice.Krakow@S...>

• Prev by Date: XSL FO, keeping text on the same row
• Next by Date: RE: validating against the standard W3C
• Previous by thread: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• Next by thread: A question about a complex type
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread