[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: qname resolution question
I tried the schema on MSFT .NET's XmlValidatingReader and got the following message ERROR: The 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema:documentBody' element is not declared. which I think is correct and the wrong answer is that being given by XSV and Xerces. From section 3.15.3 [Constraints on XML Representations of Schemas] of the W3C XML schemas Structures recommnedation, part 2.2.1 states that "Where the type of an attribute information item in a document involved in ·validation· is identified as ·QName·, its ·actual value· is composed of a local name and a namespace name. Its ·actual value· is determined based on its ·normalized value· and the containing element information item's [in-scope namespaces] following [XML-Namespaces]: The appropriate case among the following must be true: 2 otherwise (its ·normalized value· is unprefixed) all of the following must be true: 2.1 its ·local name· is its ·normalized value·. 2.2 The appropriate case among the following must be true: 2.2.1 If there is a namespace in the [in-scope namespaces] whose [prefix] has no value, then its ·namespace name· is the [namespace name] of that namespace." [0] So from the above, this seems to mean when trying to resolve the qname of documentBody in the ref attribute of the element it ends up as http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema:documentBody. But looking at section 3.3.2 [XML Representation of Element Declaration Schema Components] it should be noted in the table for the element Element Information Item there exists the following Element Declaration Schema Component Property Representation {target namespace} The ·actual value· of the targetNamespace [attribute] of the parent <schema> element information item, or ·absent· if there is none so the from the documentBody's declaration it actually has no targetNameSpace. Thus its qname should be "documentBody". Thus the MSFT error message seems to be correct since there is no documentBody element declared in the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema namespace while XSV and Xerces look like they are incorrect. -- THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #18 I will not have a son. Although his laughably under-planned attempt to usurp power would easily fail, it would provide a fatal distraction at a crucial point in time. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Takuki Kamiya" <takuki@p...> To: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: qname resolution question > Hi, > > I am wondering if the following schema is valid or not. > (I tend to think it is invalid.) > > Both XSV and xerces passes validation with it. > > What is the namespace name for the "documentBody" > qname below? Is it "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema", > or is it none (as targetNamespace is not provided)? > > Thanks in advance. > > > <?xml version ="1.0"?> > <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > > > <element name = "envelope"> > <complexType> > <sequence> > <element ref = "documentBody"/> > </sequence> > </complexType> > </element> > > <element name = "documentBody" type="anyType"/> > > </schema> > > -Takuki Kamiya > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|