[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: validating against the standard W3C

• To: "'AndrewWatt2000@a...'" <AndrewWatt2000@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: validating against the standard W3C
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:49:49 -0800

> So if you put those validators and their error messages together with the
results 
> from the tool you are already using then you will begin to (hopefully)
creep 
> closer to the truth. 

And you might check the discrepency against the formal Rec. At least that
way you've narrowed down what you have to read. I will say that it's hard to
find what you're looking for in the Structures Rec unless unless you're very
familiar with it. I often resort to keyword search myself.

Another resource is the Deja-vu archive of the XMLSchema-dev mailing list,
again doing keyword searches. There's a number of Rec mavens on that list
who've answered almost every question at least once.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: validating against the standard W3C
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: is possible to declare a nillable decimal?
• Next by Date: Re: validating against the standard W3C
• Previous by thread: RE: validating against the standard W3C
• Next by thread: Re: validating against the standard W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread