[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Caught napping!

• To: rpbourret@r...
• Subject: Re: Caught napping!
• From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@e...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:48:01 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Delivered-to: xml-dev@m...
• In-reply-to: <3BED9195.55D2DD82@r...>
• Reply-to: Dan Weinreb <dlw@e...>

   Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:44:05 -0800
   From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

   1) The XML specification defines a serialization syntax. It does not
   define what that syntax models. Thus, in a strict sense, my comment is
   correct. However, depending on your view of the world, this may or may
   not apply.

I think that's true of the "XML spec" proper, but wouldn't you say
that the "XML Info Set spec" does talk about what the syntax models,
at least to some extent?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Caught napping!
• Next by Date: ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Next by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread