[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents
> -----Original Message----- > From: Amy Lewis [mailto:amyzing@t...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:27 PM > To: Bullard, Claude L (Len) > Cc: David Brownell; Jeff Lowery; xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents > > A number of "hot" open source projects > have been shut down due to enforcement of patents ... > sometimes patents that are defensible, but more often, > since most software patents are indefensible on their faces, not. I think this is the real core of the issue, and why many people are outraged at the W3C: The vendors pushing for a more clear (and potentially favorable) W3C patent policy talk about their hard-won intellectual property that must be protected. The people venting at the W3C tend to think of most software patents as nothing but "new screw thread pitches" as someone put it the other day ... minor variations on well-known practice that would not be patentable if the USPTO employed examiners with software development experience. Perhaps the way forward is to acknowledge that there may be SOME new software inventions that are so novel and useful that they deserve a place in a limited number of W3C Recommendations, even if that entails developers licensing patents under RAND terms... but that there are certainly MANY patents that are at best defensive, at worst fraudulent, and the W3C should lend its resources and credibility to challenging them.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|