[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Here's a good question
Tom Bradford wrote: > > Why does the DOM [expletive deleted] so badly? I'll leave the many reasons for the > question to your imagination and cumulative experience. I have a hard time using the word "[expletive deleted]" with the DOM. Admittedly, it lacks the elegance of SAX 1.0, but I found it almost trivial to learn and have had very few problems, except for the omissions I posted the other day (and the fact that the interfaces aren't listed in a discernable order in the spec -- maybe alphabetic would help?) The DOM also is one of the few XML specs that is modularized, a thing I am very, very happy about. > Is it all Mike Champion's fault? :) Probably. If we just had more people like him to blame... -- Ron
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|