[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: open, closed, "SGML for the Web"

• From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 09:07:31 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@g...]
> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 2:25 AM
> To: Simon St.Laurent
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: open, closed, "SGML for the Web"
> 
> 
> * Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >Since then, we've seen all kinds of features added to XML.
> 
> What features for example?

Simon probably means "the XML family of W3C specs", not XML 1.0.

Here's a question: when people in the "real world" talk about XML, are they
generally referring to "XML 1.0" or "XML + namespaces + XSLT +schemas +
alltheotherstuff"?  

• Prev by Date: RE: The tragedy of the commons
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace name: better to use URN or URL?
• Previous by thread: Re: open, closed, "SGML for the Web"
• Next by thread: RE: The tragedy of the commons
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread