[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Debating "civil disobedience" againstoverlycomplicatedspec
That indeed would be an interesting XML conformance experiment. However, I was referring to precedents of specification rather than precedents of implementations' conformance levels. SOAP is the first specification I've heard of that treats DOCTYPE declarations as errors. Are there any other specifications that do this? Evan ----- Original Message ----- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...> To: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:23 AM Subject: Re: Debating "civil disobedience" against overlycomplicatedspecs > At 01:43 24/09/2001 -0700, Evan Lenz wrote: > >I know of no other vocabulary that calls itself an application of XML in > >which I do not have the freedom, if I so choose, to declare an internal DTD > >subset in order to declare an internal entity. > > Now that would make a *very* interesting experiment. > > How many of the following do the right thing with > internal document type declaration subsets? > > XHTML Browsers > XML-RPC Servers > WAP Gateways (WML Processors) > JXTA (XML "subset") > RSS clients > SVG browsers > WSDL processors > > Sean
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|