[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
I find it amusing that we are having discussion about what labels to use in our discussion about labels. :-) I used the word "meaning" because my coffee carafe broke this morning and in my caffeine-withdrawl induced stupor I couldn't think of a better word. :-) Thanks, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@x...> To: "Peter Piatko" <piatko@r...>; "Ronald Bourret" <rpbourret@r...>; <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:11 PM Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters. > Peter Piatko wrote: > > So far on this list I've seen 2, well 2.5, interpretations: > > > > (1) A ulabel should have a 1-1 mapping to its "meaning" (a word I am being > > intentionally vague about). > > Please let's not use the word "meaning". It's obviously only a part of the > meaning. A content model is what a DTD maps a name to. Is the term "content > model" broad enough to cover all of the cases we're talking about? > > Evan Lenz > XYZFind Corp. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|