[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: breaking up?
"I get the impression that many people don't make use of namespaces": Here is someone who does use them - as one of the enabling technologies for third party extensions to a software product line. Manoj Dhooria Geometric Software, Bombay -----Original Message----- From: Peter Piatko [mailto:piatko@r...] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:03 AM To: Al Snell; Sean McGrath Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: breaking up? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Snell" <alaric@a...> To: "Sean McGrath" <sean.mcgrath@p...> Cc: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:40 PM Subject: RE: breaking up? > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Sean McGrath wrote: > > > I have never - outside of using other W3C technologies - had a need > > for namespaces and a thin layer of skin peels away from the soles > > of my feet every time I think about them to hard. > > I've never ever heard that expression before! > As a person more familiar with programming languages than markup, I find this akin to having an allergic reaction to the "package" construct in Java. ;-) I'm sure plenty of people will point out holes in my analogy, but for the sake of argument, I could say that packages in Java are around simply to resolve class name conflicts, and (w/ apologies to Sean for paraphrasing his above comment) that I have never - outside of what comes with the JDK - had a need for packages and that various layers of skin and limbs fall off just at the thought of them (i.e. lord forbid if I put *my* class definitions in a package). In fact, in Java I don't have to declare my classes in any package, and this works out fine for small programs, but it's pretty clear that an organizing principle above class definitions is a good idea as programs get larger. That's what packages are for. I tend to think that namespaces in XML at least attempt to play a similar role to packages in Java. From the past few days of reading the mailing list I get the impression that many people don't make use of namespaces. Am I making an even vaguely correct statement? If this is true, I wonder why. Are vocabularies sufficiently small so that namespaces are unnecessary? Thanks, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------ The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|