[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word

• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:44:49 +1000

 From: "Christian Nentwich" <c.nentwich@c...>
 > >   <xsl:template match="x:name">
> >      <xsl:if select="parent::x:person">
> >          <!-- oops I need this extra test because name is reused--
> >         those darned people at x:: namespace keep on adding
> >         new local elements and our code is written to just use
> >         the markup. Why cannot they just use vanilla XML.... -->
> 
> Isn't this cheating slightly ? If you work based on a context, you would
> quite likely call a template
> instead of matching one. I am with Nicolas here in that I think it's
> quite unlikely that you want to process name without being in the
> process of processing (sorry :) a particular parent node.


Either way doesn't change the point.  If you have a script written
(using names not vapor-PSVI)
under the assumption that there are no local types (or, at least, 
a known set of local types, the others being global, and the
local type not being a compatible restriction of the global type), then
introducing local types forces you to do some more programming
to fix it.  It is not robust.

The reuse of the element may cause some failure, but it is just
as likely to introduce spurious data.  

Contrast this with adding a new global--per-namespace name.
Your script will already have handled this: either strip or fail, probably.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: RE: How to specify a Processing Instruction?
• Previous by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread