[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Application Design
(As the good Mr. Champion notes, I missent this mail) ABS ----- Forwarded message from Mike.Champion@S... ----- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:13:38 -0400 From: Mike.Champion@S... Reply-To: Mike.Champion@S... Subject: RE: Application Design To: alaric@a... Hi Al, I didn't see this on the list ... did you send it to just me by mistake? I think it makes a VERY good point ... XSLT works if you can get away with its built-in functions like sum() and count(), but if you need to do something like a standard deviation, you're outta luck, or at least you're in for an ugly time. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@a...] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:50 AM > To: Mike.Champion@S... > Subject: RE: Application Design > > > Quoting Mike.Champion@S...: > > > > If only the world were so simple! > > > > So, let's make it that simple :~) Maybe XSLT isn't what we > really need, > > but > > maybe there's a subset of XSLT that hits the 80/20 point, or maybe > > there's a > > more elegant alternative that does what we hoped XSLT would do. > > I like your thinking. > > For web designers, I've seen their needs as a very basic > templating language > that is just an HTML or XML document with special elements to: > > 1) Insert value of (expression) here > 2) If (condition expression) do (this) else (this) > 3) For each value in (list expression) do (this) > > Those "expressions" include normal number/string arithmetic > plus the power of > function-calling. The usual functions are supplied with the > core system, plus a > few functions to query SQL databases and XML documents and so > on. The backend > developers ideally provide functions to handle all those > details, but for simple > systems and simple parts of systems, being able to go direct > to the database > comes in handy. > > The expressions are dead simple. Simpler than XPath. Easier > to extend (XPath > allows for extensions with namespaced functions, but there's > no easy way to > exploit this in the implementations I've seen). From the application > programmer's perspective, there must be a language binding > standard like DOM > that explains how to invoke templates and how to set up a > "template engine" and > register functions in it for the template authors to use. > > What it definitely LACKS is templates and their matching. > THis thing is not for > converting DocBook into HTML. This thing is for displaying a > page of search > results etc. Converting DocBook into HTML is what XSLT is good at. > > I wrote a content management system based upon this > architecture once and > everyone loves using it, so it's a workable approach. > > > And > > as Michael Rys pointed out, as XSLT gets embedded deep into OS or DB > > or > > server architectures, we start to see some serious performance > > improvements > > over procedural ASP/JSP/CGI/etc. alternatives. > > I'm real keen to know how this works and to see some figures. > I'm sure like > isn't being compared with like! > > > I'd be very interested in hearing from people who have tried to > > implement > > more complex XSLT applications. When does XSLT generally > hit the wall? > > *shudder* There are certain kinds of computation it can't do. > Note that it has > sum() and count() functions, so you can do totals and > arithmetic means, but if > they want a standard deviation it gets a little harder all of > a sudden. And the > whole problem of the input XML document - in a Web > application, the designers > are always changing their minds about what to put on what > page. With my > templating system approach (that HAS no initial document, > just functions that > return values on demand) they get to choose what data they > want, rather than > having to ask the guy who writes the code that generates the > XML data to change > what data are there before the designers can update their > XSLT to display said > data. > > > Is > > there an alternative (given than you have XML data as the > input) other > > than > > just writing code? (For example, does anyone other than Al > Snell find > > PHP > > templates to be a more powerful, easier to use alternative?) > > http://www.php.net/ > http://www.php.net/usage.php > > > How do > > people > > feel about XQuery's output reformatting capabilities as an > 80/20 point > > for > > real-world web applications? > > Not yet played :-( > > ABS > > -- > Alaric B. Snell > http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ > http://www.warhead.org.uk/ > Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Alaric B. Snell http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/ Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in softwareTitle: RE: Application Design Hi Al, I didn't see this on the list ... did you send it to just me by mistake? I think it makes a VERY good point ... XSLT works if you can get away with its built-in functions like sum() and count(), but if you need to do something like a standard deviation, you're outta luck, or at least you're in for an ugly time. Mike > -----Original Message-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|