[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:23 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters. > > > At 12:59 PM 24/08/01 -0700, Fuchs, Matthew wrote: > > In the meantime, in order to do the least > >harm to future solutions, I advocate completely excising > local elements from > >the namespace mechanism by applying Andrew Layman's Wittgensteinian > >interpretation of unqualified as meaning out of the scope of > the namespace > >rec. entirely. > > If by "unqualified" you mean "unprefixed, and with no default > namespace in effect" then Andrew's interpretation is the only > one that is consistent with a sane reading of the namespace rec. > [And this seems to be the position adopted by XSD; does > anyone disagree?] -Tim > Yes, that's precisely what I mean. However, "consistent" and "sane" were not often a characteristic of readings of the namespace rec I've been privy to. :-) Matthew
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|