[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [OT] The stigma of schema

• From: Rod Davison <rdavison@s...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, Steve Rowe <sarowe@t...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:52:55 -0400

I think this has to be the last word on the subject.  Enemata!?!
This is becomming a tad surreal.  Let's just each make up our own plural and 
be  done with it.   I think I'm going to use schemaux. Then if I write more 
than one schema that doesn't follow the spec, I'll have faux schemaux.





On Friday 29 June 2001 02:48 pm, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Steve Rowe wrote:
> > Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> > 23. enema/enemata

-- 
====================================================
Rod Davison @ Critical Knowledge Systems Inc
rdavison@s...
====================================================
This message has been brought to you by the language C and the number F.
====================================================

• References:
  • RE: [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Steve Rowe <sarowe@t...>
  • Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML and the Real World
• Next by Date: Going to the extreme
• Previous by thread: Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Next by thread: RE: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread