[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: experts

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:09:45 -0600

VRML97 sat there fat dumb and happy for 
five years.

Some people get it right the first time. ;-)

This next pass is the real bear.  We decided 
to use XML.  Boy was that ever a hit to the 
head.   It seems XML comes with a HUGE family 
of siblings and they eat the effort out of 
house and home trying to keep up.

"The problem is not crossing the road," 
said the Chicken, "it's the traffic."

Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: Gavin Thomas Nicol; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: experts


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> I stand corrected.  I knew they had to 
> review every five years, but I thought 
> intervening changes were restricted to 
> things such as Technical Corrigenda.

The ISO 10646 WG issued 31 Amendments and
1 or 2 Corrigenda to the 1993 edition
(= Unicode 2.0) before coming out with
the 2000 edition (= Unicode 3.0).

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: experts
    • From: Justin Couch <justin@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: experts
• Next by Date: RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models)
• Previous by thread: Re: experts
• Next by thread: Re: experts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread