[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Web Philosophy

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:28:01 -0500

At 03:00 AM 3/29/01 +0100, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
> > > Final word: the W3C is not a regulatory body. [...]
> > > If you wish to ignore it completely, why not do so?
> >
> > I can't take that last question seriously.
>
>Yes, it was a rather stupid point. Then again, after seeing the
>immortal words:-
>
>      Do we really want a Web designed by experts?
>
>I'm now quite convinced that the Universe has balanced itself out :-)

Balanced?  That's funny.

That I don't want it doesn't mean I don't have to deal with it.

I'm irritated that I can't ignore a Web designed by experts.  Hardly seems 
balanced to me!


Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• References:
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@m...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models
• Next by Date: RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models
• Previous by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Next by thread: RE: Web Philosophy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread