[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML second edition question: E29

• From: Staffan Måhlén <staffan.mahlen@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:44:37 +0100

I have been working my way through the errata updates to comfirm XML second
edition compliance and one item has been bothering me. E29 removes a
sentence to make the text comply with the constraints, removing the
necessity for PEs to be declared before being used when in non-validating
mode. 

Does this indicate that non-validating processing should be "harder" for the
processor and require some kind of two pass parse or delayed resolution? 

In an attempt to see if i understood the issue correctly i tried running the
following example with MSXML without validation and it seemed to require
declaration of the PE: "Parameter entity must be defined before it is used".
The way i am reading the errata i guess that should be considered a bug
nowadays? (Or is it coverted in one of the "if-not-validating" sections?)

Example:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE test [
<!ELEMENT test (#PCDATA)>
%zz; 
<!ENTITY % zz '&#60;!ENTITY nonTricky "error-prone" >' >
]>
<test>
	&nonTricky;
</test>

Looking at the errata for the second edition it seems the E8 clarification
applies to this. However i am having trouble seeing the rationale for this,
would someone fill me in on the reasoning behind allowing non-declared PEs
when not validating? I would have found the correction to make it as a WFC
more "appropriate". I did try searching the archive but any pointers would
be helpful.


/Staffan Måhlén

• Prev by Date: RE: Mapping W3C schemas to object schemas to relational schemas
• Next by Date: Re: PSVI
• Previous by thread: Re: <xinclude> & unimplementable specs
• Next by thread: [ANN] last call for reviews of PRISM metadata spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread