[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail

• From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:28:39 -0800

At 09:28 27-02-2001, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>No one *FORCES* me to comply with the IETF's RFCs (Request For Comments,
>anyone? More political cover for its originating era...), either. (That
>would be treading on the ground of *law*, not standards, BTW - and perhaps
>that is what you believe 'a standard' is - a standard with the force of
>the legal system behind it via trademark or other IP based enforcement
>mechanism. If so, you are mistaken.).

That's exactly what a Standard is.  The situation is a little weaker in the 
US, but in many countries ISO Standards *do* have the force of law.  ANSI 
is an independent organization, but the ISO representatives from other 
countries are often government bodies.

The use of "standard" with a small s isn't as big a deal, but it's still 
useful, IMO, to distinguish between standards produced by international or 
open organizations (ISO, IETF) and specifications (my preferred generic 
term) produced by industry consortia (W3C, OMG, OSF).

-Chris
-- 
Christopher R. Maden, XML Consultant
<URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >

• References:
  • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
  • Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?
• Next by Date: Where's the Dublin Core when you need one?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread