[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blowout

• From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <k-kawa@b...>
• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:43:37 -0800

> I don't think there are any explosive constructs in TREX.
> In James' reference implementation of TREX (if I understand it

But the very existence of INTERLEAVE and CONCUR makes it impossible to
implement efficient automaton-based validator.


> I believe that RELAX can be implemented in the same way, though
> I don't know if any of the existing implementations do so.

Current verifier for Java is implemented on the basis of automaton.
In this implementation, parsing a schema costs more, but validating
instances costs less.

As you said, implementing it by using "regular expression residual" is
also possible, and should be resulted in the same performance properties.

regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: k-kawa@b...

• References:
  • Blowout
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blowout
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: History Part Quatre: Keeping Decisions In Scope (Was: Re: Requestfor info about parser construction details)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Parser in Servlet Performance Problem
• Previous by thread: Re: Blowout
• Next by thread: ANNOUNCE: XML in a Nutshell
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread