[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Standard RDDL processing order or ALL?
Jeff Rafter wrote: To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...> Cc: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: Standard RDDL processing order or ALL? > In light of the recent discussion regarding DTD/Schema processing I am left > to wonder: > > Is there a standard use for an RDDL document containing both a DTD and XML > Schema and (* your favorite schema here *) where one of the following is > possible (maybe more): > ... > > 4) This is processor specific and RDDL is just a directory. > It is a fair question. My thinking is that RDDL does not specify how or whether a document decides to validate. A RDDL document could offer a preferred schema using an xl:arcrole such as "#primary-schema" vs. "#alternate-schema" but that would be up to the processor. If this is something that people want to do, I we could define URIs in arcroles.htm which could be used in this situation. -Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|