[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XNRL

• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 14:09:15 +0000

>  http://www.textuality.com/xml/xnrl.html

Good attempt, but once again the XHTML Modularization side is suspect:-

> To the html element, add a namespace declaration for XLink
> as in the following DTD fragment:
> <!ATTLIST html xmlns:xl CDATA #FIXED
>    "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" >

You need to specify other namespaces with QNames files according to the
Modularization of XHTML CR.

> A related-resource link is a div element

I realise that we were somewhat overloading the <link> element, but I think
it can be extended to allow other closed elements in its content model:-

<link type="[...]" rel="[...]">
 <div xlinkstuff XNRL />
 <div another schema />
</link>

It means we'll have to mess around with the XHTML Basic content model a
bit, but it'll be worth it.

Happy new year!

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• References:
  • XNRL
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
• Next by Date: Plan A + Plan B = Plan C?
• Previous by thread: XNRL
• Next by thread: Re: XNRL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread