[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Textual transmission typically faster?

• From: Mark.Papiani@u...
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:08:46 +0000

Hi,

I just read p.19 of Brett McLaughin's book, Java and XML (O'Reilly), 
and was a little surprised by the statement:

"Although some binary data formats can be transmitted very efficiently, 
textual transmissions will typically average out as a faster means of 
communication".

Could anyone expand on this statement for me, and perhaps supply 
references to any papers/benchmarks that show some results?

I have read Several articles discussing XML/HTTP as a distributed 
computing protocol and these often list the pros/cons of XML/HTTP 
versus CORBA/RMI (or raw socket) based communications (or discuss how 
these can be combined with XML). 

An often quoted disadvantage of XML/HTTP is that it will be less 
efficient than a binary protocol. It seems intuitive that compressed 
formats would exhibit better network performance than textual 
transmission. But perhaps this depends on the size of the chunks of 
data to be transferred and the processing necessary to encode/decode 
the data?

Thanks,

---
Dr Mark Papiani
Email: mark.papiani@u...


Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
    • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
• Previous by thread: Re: a11n [OT] (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?)
• Next by thread: Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread