[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalo
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > > Since this thing is directing one to a bunch of potentially > > > interesting and related resources, "resource directory" seems > > > the most natural to me (I can take or leave "discovery"). > > > > How about Resource Description File? > > I likes it, but the "RDF" would probably be confusing. Of course, Dan, as > RDF activity chair (or whatever it is precisely) you have no intentions > whatever in increasing the pervasity of your ward acronym, hmm? > > Just kidding, of course. Me too ;-) If the RD* file didn't have a natural interpretation within the RDF model I'd be rather worried though, since we're basically talking about a bunch of typed, annotated links pointing to typed Web-addressable resources. FWIW I'll be putting XHTML and RDF at most of my namespaces and could really do with a vocabulary for pointing to Java classes, XML schemata, public keys, XSLTs and suchlike to include alongside. So what about Resource Description Resource? <ducks/> Dan (RDF Interest Group chair)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|