[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.

• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:31:26 -0800

> The <sht missing="i"/> hits the fan when I need to
> process XML not under my control. Some of the XML coming over the wire
> pushes the envelope and that is where the trouble starts.

FWIW. I have encountered very little XML that caused
me grief. From what I've seen the "envelope pushers"
are isolated in relatively small communites, just as
those that used advanced features of SGML were.

• References:
  • RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>

• Prev by Date: XML and UI's: XSL Beans
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2 Question
• Previous by thread: RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
• Next by thread: RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread