[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
> implementors posting on the SOAP discussion list often > raised "issues" and proposed "solutions" for those issues blissfully > ignorant of the fact that these issues had already been solved by > available XML technologies. One that kept surfacing, for instance, > was various proposals for how to encode Unicode characters in a SOAP > message (which became a particularly important issue since the "XML" > implementations of the SOAP libraries did not deal with > character encoding issues properly And the operational test to distinguish between this and "innovation" in the "embrace and extend" sense would be? Just joking! Really, just a little light humor! S. ===== <!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life." - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations --> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! http://calendar.yahoo.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|