[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: What does it mean: chronologically less

• From: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@k...>
• To: 'Miloslav Nic' <nicmila@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:55:00 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Miloslav Nic [SMTP:nicmila@i...]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:51 AM
> To:	xml-dev@x...
> Subject:	What does it mean: chronologically less
> 
> Reading through the XML Schema specification, I am doubting what
> chronologically less actually means
> 
> is the 10th October 2000 chronologically less or greater than 12th
> October 2000  ?
> 
> I can imagine an explanation for both variants, so which one is the
> right one?
> 
2000-10-10 < 2000-10-12.

I'm really curious, what explanation can you give that would allow an
interpretation of "chronologically less" to mean that 2000-10-12 <
2000-10-10?

pvb
Co-Editor, XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2

• Prev by Date: Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Previous by thread: Re: What does it mean: chronologically less
• Next by thread: XML Schema - use of min(max)Inclusive(Exclusive) on some characterbased types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread