[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RDF and Topic Maps was: RE: Services-based automation
Martin Bryan wrote: > Jonathan > > > > It seems there is overlap between the capabilities of RDF and > Topic Maps, > > which is one reason many people are hoping that the two efforts can be > > integrated. > > I'm in the process of writing an XML Schema that maps Topic Maps > to XLink in a logical manner. Hopefully this will help. But you > must not confuse the RDF Description with Topic Maps. RDF simply > assigns Metadata to resources. It cannot be used to name nodes > within resources, or to define the relationships between types of > nodes, ??? why not ??? RDF names nodes with ID/rdf:ID and rdf:about, and defines relationships with arcs. Using a URI which has a fragment identifier of the form #xpointer() you can identify 'nodes within resources'. Nodes are themselves resources. > which is what Topic Maps are all about (as well as > allowing you to assign metadata to resources in the form of facet values). > The danger is that this degenerates into a classic language war. From my standpoint, not really having a vested interest in either TM, XLink or RDF, one can probably get the job done with any of the above + a certain amount of domain specific code. The big win is getting people to agree on common formats which drives the otherwise ad-hoc domain specific code to become widely available, open source, de facto standardized etc. Jonathan Borden The Open Healthcare Group http://www.openhealth.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|