[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More StupidXMLArti
At 11:18 PM 10/4/00 +0100, Edd Dumbill wrote: >On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:49:50PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >> Why is this list getting so hyper-sensitive about any press that suggests >> XML isn't perfect? > >I'll gladly entertain notions that XML isn't perfect, but I won't do so >on the basis of an obivously erroneous (not just controversial) article. That still doesn't explain why XML-Dev is freaking out. Lousy - erroneous, sometimes wildly - articles about XML have been around since the beginning. xmlhack could have probably filled up a 'stupid press tricks' category long ago, and the Media category sometimes feels like that anyway. So why are people just starting to notice? Seems like letters to the editor are a better answer than a stupid article list on xml-dev. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|