[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - FinalReviewDraft)

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 11:00:52 -0400

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Rick JELLIFFE wrote:

> By not including DTDs as part of the infoset or DOM, the W3C groups are
> making the simplification that the document has reached its terminal
> state: if it is transformed, it is transformed into another structure. 

Or maybe the DTD-modeling problem was just a little bit more than
the WGs could easily handle, especially with the specter of having
to handle schemas Real Soon Now too.

John Cowan, speaking for himself

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
C'est la` pourtant que se livre le sens du dire, de ce que, s'y conjuguant
le nyania qui bruit des sexes en compagnie, il supplee a ce qu'entre eux,
de rapport nyait pas.               -- Jacques Lacan, "L'Etourdit"


-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

• Prev by Date: Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML -FinalReviewDraft)
• Next by Date: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: DOCTYPE replacement kit
• Next by thread: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread