[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?

• From: tpassin@h...
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 20:56:22 -0400

"Mike Brown" <mbrown@c...> wrote -

> I want to use XML to express relationships between instances of the
> conceptual/abstract objects that are each modeled by separate XML
documents
> (or separate collections of documents). I was about to make something up
> that was specific to my application, but I was wondering if there was a
> standard way to do this.
> ...
> RDF seems to be concerned with metadata like this, but a cursory
inspection
> of what RDF covers made it look like it, too, was more concerned with
> "resources" like documents. Would RDF actually be a good system for
modeling
> the kinds of relationships I am talking about, or should I just make
> something up that is specific to my application? If RDF is applicable, can
> someone provide a short example of how it should be done?
>
It would seem that somewhere, your system would need to know where foo1 and
foo2 are, if only to be able to get at their properties.  You could hide
this from a user, though.

RDF would seem to be the thing.  You could look at Topic Maps, too.

Tom Passin

• Follow-Ups:
  • how to validate a XML
    • From: Huaxin Zhang <hxzhang@c...>

• References:
  • Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
    • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@c...>

• Prev by Date: Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
• Previous by thread: Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
• Next by thread: how to validate a XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread