[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Summary: xml:lang validity and RFC 1766 refs to outdated codes[long]
At 15:42 2000 08 07 -0600, Mike Brown wrote: >It has been argued that strict interpretations of RFC 1766 would have the >effect of requiring values for XML 1.0's xml:lang attribute and HTML 4.01's >lang attribute to be created from outdated language and country code lists. > >In a post to the ietf-languages list on 02 Aug 2000, Harald Alvestrand, >author of RFC 1766, stated that his normative references to language and >country code lists (e.g. ISO 639:1988 and ISO 3166:1988) are intended to be >to those specific lists *and their future revisions*. This clarification >allows for leniency in determination of both RFC 1766 conformance and >external validity of language identifiers. I am not posting to <unicode@u...> as I am not subscribed, but someone who is might want to forward the following reference. Have you seen the relevant XML 1.0 Errata at [1]? paul [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata#E73
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|